[OhQP-mail] Suggestion for 2015 (Or later) OHQP

John Wagner john at n8cd.com
Sat Apr 12 09:51:16 CDT 2014

I like it Dave. Stations transmitting QRP tend to get the multipliers in
most contests, but the reality is that the stations RECEIVING the QRP
station is the one that has to make most of the extra effort and should get
extra credit.

 - John N8CD

On Saturday, April 12, 2014, Chasey, David A <wn9nbt at purdue.edu> wrote:

> Hank might actually be on to something here, but the multiplier (or bonus
> points) should be given to the person that WORKS a QRP station.      All
> participating stations have a level playing field as far as receive, so the
> QRP station can hear as well as anyone else.    It's more difficult to copy
> a weaker station than a stronger station, so if there is any extra
> difficulty involved, it's on the end of the guy working the QRP station,
> hence they should receive the bonus.
> ....Dave - N9FN
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OhQP-mail [mailto:ohqp-mail-bounces at ohqp.org <javascript:;>] On
> Behalf Of Hank Greeb
> Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 8:51 AM
> To: OhQP-mail at ohqp.org <javascript:;>
> Subject: [OhQP-mail] Suggestion for 2015 (Or later) OHQP
> I know it's waaaayyyyy too late for 2014 rules change, but...... How about
> a "power multiplier" for the High Power, Low Power, and QRP categories for
> 2017 or 2018 or maybe 2050?  (by 2050 may allow enough time for the OHQP
> committee to consider a change, knowing how long it takes for change to
> happen within Ohio)  And for those who don't recall, this LID lived in Ohio
> for over 40+ years.
>  From the New Mexico QSO Party rules, to wit:
> =====================
> 8. Multipliers / Bonuses
> a. Power Multipliers (the highest output power used at any time during the
> contest will determine the power multiplier for all contacts.) i. QRP: 5
> watts output or less: x5 ii. Low Power: > 5 - 150 watts output: x2 iii.
> High Power: more than 150 watts output: x1 ===================== Yes, I
> know, I know, the hams in Ohio know MUCH BETTER than others elsewhere, so
> we can't learn from them. But I'm a stupid enough LID to not understand
> this axiom of common knowledge of the "Gurus on high" to whom we all bow in
> obsequious sycophancy, never daring to question their omnipotent and
> supreme knowledge and wisdom.
> 72/73 de n8xx Hg
> QRP >99.44% of the time
> _______________________________________________
> OhQP-mail mailing list
> OhQP-mail at ohqp.org <javascript:;>
> http://mail.ohqp.org/mailman/listinfo/ohqp-mail_ohqp.org
> _______________________________________________
> OhQP-mail mailing list
> OhQP-mail at ohqp.org <javascript:;>
> http://mail.ohqp.org/mailman/listinfo/ohqp-mail_ohqp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ohqp.org/pipermail/ohqp-mail_ohqp.org/attachments/20140412/071202fb/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the OhQP-mail mailing list